Media and the warfare state

By Sara Hanson

American author and media critic Norman Solomon has been an active voice within the independent media sector since first getting involved with independent, alternative radio in 1971. He has written extensively about the close relationship between corporate media and American politics, and the harmful effects of this relationship, specifically in the context of war. His latest book, “Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America’s Warfare State,” presents both a historical examination and personal reflection of the warfare state’s evolution throughout the last fifty years. Solomon will be speaking about Media and Democracy in the Digital Era in MacEwan Ballroom at 7 p.m. Fri., Nov. 2.

Gauntlet: Where did you start out as a journalist?

Solomon: I started out in the Washington, D.C. area in high school, and then after high school at a mainstream, weekly paper in the mid to late-1960s.

G: Was there something that specifically sparked your change in attitude towards the mainstream media?

S: It was a number of things, but a big element was the Vietnam War, and the way in which the war, and the dissent against the war, was being covered or not covered.

G: Why are you so intrigued by the idea of the ‘warfare state’ and what exactly does this idea mean by your definition?

S: The ways that war and militarianism permeate so much of United States society are very powerful in all walks of life and often we don’t notice it. It’s a concentric condition, there are many different rings around the circle–the personal dimensions of acceptance and of enablement. There are the media aspects of messages and numbing, the political dimensions of rhetoric and the economic driving forces. There are huge profits being made from what President Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex.

G: What do you mean by “numbing?”

Desensitizing is important for the war-fare state and if there is sort of an anesthetic provided to feeling, then its helpful for encouraging and achieving acceptance and passivity from individuals and society as a whole.

G: What is your latest book about?

S: It’s really about the last half century, the fifty years of the warfare state in the U.S., in its different dimensions, often personal, certainly social and cultural, as well as economic and political. A lot of the media threads go through so many different aspects of life. Since I grew up in the 1950s and 60s, it’s an opportunity to examine the history of the United States in its different dimensions, and then use that as a counterpoint my own first-hand experiences, my eye-witness accounts, which is another dimension of the historical record.

G: You have said “the warfare state doesn’t come and go.” Do you think the majority of Americans just accept the warfare state as the way their government operates, or are the majority ignorant to the idea in the first place?

S: Most people accept it and there are varying degrees of accommodation and knowledge. It is a constant, and therefore, it is something we become acculturated to, even though our responses are widely different. It’s very tough for us to get an overview of the warfare state, as a topic for media discussion, as there are these pervasive effects on society.

G: Why do you think it is such a hard topic to get access to? Is it because of media control, or is it because people don’t necessarily want to understand it?

S: It’s so large, that’s one aspect, and also its frightening, which might account for some aversion from looking at it. It goes to the core of who we are as individuals in society. Darwin had the opinion that what distinguishes humans most of all from other animals is conscience. Once you get into questions of your country being at war, then there is a conscience–you either kick it or don’t. A lot of people are conflicted about their action or lack of action in response to a war that is done in their names with their tax dollars.

G: Do you think a large number of Americans think the idea of the warfare state is just a left-wing myth that has been devised to scare people?

S: When you get down to the particulars, most people are at least a little bit opposed, but when it comes to the systemic nature of what I think is accurately described as the warfare state, there is a lot of failure to engage with it. It’s not a problem, not a huge problem or “too big for me to deal with.” I don’t think that’s a good approach, because even if you’re not into politics, politics is into you and will affect your life whether you want it to or not.

G: Can the democracies of the U.S. and Canada be true democracies under such consolidated news media? If so, then how?

S: I would say we have elements of democracy and real gaps–absences and short-falls of democracy–and the absences we pay for dearly. The elements of democracy that we have–the freedoms of speech and press–give us opportunities, but how that will be resolved is all up for grabs. One of the important ways to affect the future will be independent media that provide an alternative to the corporate-driven coverage. It’s one of the key elements for the future–how strong and what character alternative media can develop.

G: What do you think the future holds for alternative media? Can it sustain itself in the face of increasing media conglomeration?

S: I think it can sustain itself, and even grow, but at the same time the major question is ‘to what extent can the independent media make inroads in public awareness.’ Because [independent media is] marginalized, [there are] limitations on [its] impacts.

G: How much promise does the internet hold for alternative media?

S: The promise is enormous, but the dangers are quite large too, in terms of the efforts to create a two-tiered system and with the corporate effort to exploit more from the internet. While we are so often told that the internet is revolutionizing media and is a tool for democracy–it potentially is, but technology has never created democracy, people have always created democracy. It has been tempting to believe that one technological innovation after another–going from the telegraph to radio to television to cable TV and to the internet–will be the tipping point for democracy, and that’s not the case. Decentralized technology such as the internet is necessary, but not sufficient for creating authentic democratic discourse.

G: Does the responsibility to change the current system of corporate media lie with journalists or with media consumers?

S: It’s a shared responsibility. We all need to keep pushing from our various angles–nobody gets off the hook. The term media activism is almost an oxymoron in our cultural context, because media is passivity, at least that is the intended result from corporate programmers. They want us to keep watching, listening and reading. The idea that we could be actively engaged in media is a relatively new one for a lot of people, and yet that’s really the key. Media activism is the opposite of media passivity.

G: What can the average citizen do to stand up to the media conglomerates?

S: It’s about not simply consuming–not defining ourselves as those who buy, listen, read and hear, but as those who speak, think, organize, critique and are part of the process of communication, rather than simply tuning in.


  1. Hello! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search
    Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for
    some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.

    If you know of any please share. Thanks!

  2. Tremendous issues here. I’m very satisfied to see your article.Thanks so much and I’m having a look ahead to contact you.Will you please drop me a mail?

  3. An interesting discussion is worth comment. I do believe that you ought to write moreon this subject matter, it may not be a taboo matterbut generally folks don’t speak about such topics.To the next! Best wishes!!

  4. I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark
    your weblog and check again here frequently.
    I’m quite sure I’ll learn plenty of new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!

  5. When someone writes an post he/she retains the plan of a user in his/her mind that how
    a user can be aware of it. So that’s why this paragraph is great.

  6. Your way of explaining all in this piece of writing is in fact
    good, every one be capable of easily know it, Thanks a

  7. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to mention that I’ve truly loved browsing
    your weblog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing on your
    feed and I hope you write again soon!

  8. I will immediately clutch your rss as I can not to find
    your e-mail subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Please let me understand so that I may subscribe.

  9. Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your web site is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for more articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the information I already searched everywhere and just could not come across. What a perfect site.

  10. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a co-worker who has been conducting a little homework on this.
    And he actually ordered me dinner simply because I discovered it for him…

    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending the time to discuss this
    issue here on your web page.

  11. Great weblog here! Additionally your site lots up fast! What web host are
    you the usage of? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink for your host?
    I want my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  12. Thanks , I’ve recently been looking for information approximately thissubject for a long time and yours is the greatest I have came upon so far.But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you certain in regardsto the source?

  13. Hey! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new apple iphone!
    Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts!

    Keep up the fantastic work!

  14. Fine way of telling, and fastidious paragraphto get facts on the topic of my presentation topic, which i am goingto convey in institution of higher education.

  15. Hey there I am so thrilled I found your site, I really found you by error, while I was researching on Bing for something else, Anyways
    I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a incredible post and a all round thrilling
    blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to
    read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

  16. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have learn this submit and if I may I desire to recommend you few fascinating things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles regarding this article. I wish to learn even more things about it!

  17. We stumbled over here different web address and thought I should check things out.
    I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to exploring
    your web page again.

  18. If you wish for to grow your knowledge simply keep visiting this webpage and be updated with the latest news posted here.

  19. If you want to improve your know-how only keep visiting this site and
    be updated with the hottest news update posted here.

  20. I got this website from my friend who shared with me concerning
    this website and now this time I am visiting this website and reading very
    informative content at this place.

  21. Your mode of explaining all in this post is actually fastidious, every one be capable of without difficulty be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

Leave a comment